Identification of a know-do gap: An observational study of the assessment and treatment of dysphagia during inpatient stroke rehabilitation in primary healthcare in Norway.

PURPOSE: Oropharyngeal dysphagia is a common swallowing impairment post-stroke managed by speech language pathologists (SLP). This article aims to demonstrate a local know-do gap assessment for usual dysphagia care for patients undergoing inpatient stroke rehabilitation in primary healthcare in Norway, which included an assessment of the functional level of the patients and characteristics and outcomes of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this observational study, we assessed the outcomes and interventions of patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation following stroke. The patients received usual care from SLPs while the research team administered a dysphagia assessment protocol that included assessment of several swallowing domains including oral intake, swallowing, patient self-reported functional health status and health-related quality of life, and oral health. The treating SLPs documented the treatments provided in a treatment diary. RESULTS: Of 91 patients who consented, 27 were referred for SLP and 14 received treatment. During the median treatment period of 31.5 days (IQR = 8.8-57.0), patients received 7.0 treatment sessions (IQR = 3.8-13.5) of 60 minutes (IQR = 55-60). The patients who received SLP treatment demonstrated no/minor disorders (n = 7) and moderate/severe disorders (n = 7). Dysphagia treatments primarily included oromotor training and advice on bolus modification and were provided without association to dysphagia severity. Patients with moderate/severe swallowing impairments received slightly more SLP sessions over a longer time. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified gaps between current and best practices and opportunities to improve assessment, decision-making, and implement evidence-based practices.

Feasibility and Safety of Early Post-COVID-19 High-Intensity Gait Training: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: The feasibility and safety of rehabilitation interventions for individuals recovering from COVID-19 after the acute stage is not well understood. This pilot study aims to provide a preliminary investigation of the feasibility and safety of providing high-intensity gait training (HIT) with a targeted cardiovascular intensity of 70-85% of the age-predicted maximum heart rate (HRmax) for individuals undergoing rehabilitation post-COVID-19. METHODS: Consecutive patients who were medically cleared for HIT were invited to participate in the study. Participants practiced walking in varied contexts (treadmill, overground, and stairs), aiming to spend as much time as possible within their target cardiovascular intensity zone during scheduled physical therapy (PT) sessions. Training characteristics and adverse events were collected to determine the feasibility and safety of HIT. The severity of adverse events was graded on a 1-5 scale according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. RESULTS: The participants (n = 20) took a mean of 2093 (±619) steps per PT session. The average peak heart rate during PT sessions was 81.1% (±9.4) of HRmax, and 30.1% (±21.0) of the session time was spent at heart rates ≥ 70% HRmax. Mild adverse events (grade 1) occurred in <5% of the sessions, and no intervention-requiring or life-threatening adverse events (grade 2-5) occurred. CONCLUSION: This pilot study provides preliminary evidence that HIT may be feasible and safe during inpatient rehabilitation for patients post-COVID-19 following medical clearance.

Development and Results of an Implementation Plan for High-Intensity Gait Training.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: High-intensity gait training is recommended in stroke rehabilitation to improve gait speed, walking distance, and balance. However, identifying effective and efficient implementation methods is a challenge for rehabilitation providers. This article describes the development of an implementation plan, presents findings of each implementation phase, and identifies the project's impact on clinicians and the health system. METHODS: Two inpatient rehabilitation facilities, including 9 physical therapists, collaborated with a knowledge translation center to implement this program. We developed an implementation plan using the Knowledge-to-Action Framework and utilized the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to identify barriers and select implementation strategies. Using mix-methods research, including surveys and informal discussions, we evaluated current practice, barriers, outcomes, and the sustainability of high-intensity gait training in practice. RESULTS: A multicomponent implementation plan that targeted barriers was developed. Before implementation, clinicians reported providing several balance, strength training, and gait interventions to improve walking. Barriers to using high-intensity gait training included knowledge, beliefs, adaptability of high-intensity gait training, resources, culture, and others. Twenty-six implementation strategies were selected to target the barriers. Surveys and informal discussions identified significant changes in perceived practice, adoption of high-intensity gait training, and positive impacts on the health system. The 2-year follow-up survey indicated that the new practice was sustained. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Using a multicomponent implementation plan that targeted barriers, we successfully implemented high-intensity gait training in clinical practice. Contributors to successful implementation may include the implementation methods, usual care interventions, and clinicians' readiness for this change.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A352.).